DSD 2012/2013 evaluation form
9 answers
Summary
1. As a whole, the courrse was:
very bad
excellent
Average: 4,11111111
1 -
very bad
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 2 22%
4 4 44%
5 -
excellent
3 33%
Comment - As a whole, the course was
Course was very well organized. Great experience.
Very interesting, but too much time demanding
Too much documentation
2. The course has fulfilled my expectations:
not at all
completely fulfilled
Average: 4,11111111
1 -
not at all
0 0%
2 1 11%
3 1 11%
4 3 33%
5 -
completely fulfilled
4 44%
Comment - The course has fulfilled my expectations
It was everything I hoped for, even more. It did in terms of projects and lectures, but I thought it could have been less demanding Too much documentation
3. The concept of the course with lectures and projects was:
bad
excellent
Average: 3,88888889
1 -
bad
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 2 22%
4 6 67%
5 -
excellent
1 11%
Comment - The concept of the course with lectures and projects was
Only objection for concept of lectures is beginning of course. Maybe there should be less general lectures at the begining and actuall work on project should start earlier. Maybe lectures could be distributed better between deadlines instead of putting them all at the beginning. Too much documentation
4. The course administration (web page, support, information, etc) was:
bad
excellent
Average: 4,44444444
1 -
bad
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 1 11%
4 3 33%
5 -
excellent
5 56%
Comment - The course administration was
Quite clear and useful, but sometimes finding informations is a bit tricky. Also some kind of notification system for new posts could be very useful. We could not show live demo for web application from classroom computer
5. I have learned:
nothing
a lot
Average: 4,22222222
1 -
nothing
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 3 33%
4 1 11%
5 -
a lot
5 56%
Comment - I have learned
Most valuable thing I gained is experience. Technologies, work group, a lot about people and something about customers How to handle group work
6. The lectures were:
bad
excellent
Average: 3,11111111
1 -
bad
0 0%
2 1 11%
3 6 67%
4 2 22%
5 -
excellent
0 0%
Comment - The lectures were
Some lectures were unnecessary at the beginning of the project. Too long, and there was nothing I have not already known
7. The guest lectures were:
bad
excellent
Average: 3,11111111
1 -
bad
2 22%
2 0 0%
3 3 33%
4 3 33%
5 -
excellent
1 11%
Comment - The guest lectures were
What guest lectures? Best and most interesting lectures. Too long, and there was nothing I have not already known
8. I liked to work in the project:
not at all
I loved it!
Average: 4,33333333
1 -
not at all
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 1 11%
4 4 44%
5 -
I loved it!
4 44%
Comment - I liked to work in the project
I had interesting project and worked with great people so it was pleasure to work on such project. Great team
9. The project advising and support was:
bad
excellent
Average: 3,55555555
1 -
bad
0 0%
2 1 11%
3 3 33%
4 4 44%
5 -
excellent
1 11%
Comment - The project advising and support was
Poor. We did not had technical support we all did it by ourselves, and we did not know how exactly will we be graded and what should we take care of
10. The cooperation between students from FER, POLIMI and MDH was (in your poject):
bad
excellent
Average: 4,55555555
1 -
bad
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 1 11%
4 2 22%
5 -
excellent
6 67%
Comment - The cooperation between students from FER, POLIMI and MDH was (in your project):
Some problems at the beginning which is expected of course, but later everything went smoothly. Regular communication
11. My workload was:
nothing
very heavy
Average: 4,44444444
1 -
nothing
0 0%
2 0 0%
3 1 11%
4 3 33%
5 -
very heavy
5 56%
Comment - My workload was
Surely heavier than on other courses.
12. The equipment for the distance work was:
bad
excellent
Average: 4,00000000
1 -
bad
1 11%
2 0 0%
3 0 0%
4 5 56%
5 -
excellent
3 33%
Comment - The equipment for the distance work was
Skype is more then enough. :D Definetely not sufficient on the PoliMi side, with only 1 monitor to show screens and cameras. Also Adobe Connect is not the right solution IMHO, and using a personal laptop insted of that of the teacher becomes very hard.
13. The things I most liked in the course:
I got to meet some new people from different countries and learned to work in a distributed environment. Presentations, learning new things Lots of presentations Working with people I don't know on real project. Know new people and learn .NET and MVC. The cooperation between team member. Working with foreign people that I never saw in real life. The work (project) experience. Group work
14. The following can be improved in the course:
If possible, less documentation and more time. Also, maybe better project ideas. Some lectures, Have some guest lectures Drop some unneccecary lectures on the beginning of course and instead star working on project week or two earlier. Groups creation. Put people with the same knowledge in the same group. Be sure that the focus will be on whole project phases at not only in the development parts, in order to evidence that all parts will be evaluated. Present projects a bit more and better, giving more details. Also try to follow project choices more (but I think this was not your fault, it was only my bad luck :) ) The document templates are not so intuitive, a litte more clarification would mean a lot. Also maybe adding examples (especialy for the week and summary week reports). Also some clarification on the documents and the work would be nice. - More details about grading - Length of lectures and comments, arrange pauses on every site after every 45 minutes because it gets difficult to follow if we do not have time to refresh ourselves - Amount of documentation that has to be written
15. I am a student from:
FER 6 67%
MDH 0 0%
POLIMI 3 33%
Number of daily responses